In particle physics, the bootstrap model, bootstrap principle or hadron boostrap is a superseded hypothesis about the composition of elementary particles interacting under the strong nuclear interaction. It uses general consistency criteria to determine the form of a quantum field theory from assumptions on the spectrum of particles. It is a form of S-matrix theory. The term is derived from bootstrapping as in ‘pulling oneself up by one’s bootstraps,’ as particles appears from self-consistency.[1]
It was first proposed in 1959 by Geoffrey Chew to explain particles interacting through the strong interaction.[2][3] It fell out of favor in the 1970s with the rise of quantum chromodynamics, which described hadrons (mesons and baryons) in terms of elementary particles called quarks and gluons. Nevertheless, the bootstrap model was important for the development of string theory.
History
In the 1960s, the ever-growing list of hadrons in the particle zoo. Geoffrey Chew and Stanley Mandelstam attempted to build theory of hadrons based on S-matrix theory and rejecting standard quantum field theory.[4] Quantum electrodynamics was insufficient to explain the strong interaction and it was impossible for every hadron to have its own field. Chew advocated for nuclear democracy, the idea that there was no hadron that was more elementary than the others.[4] Instead, they sought to derive as much information as possible about the strong interaction from plausible assumptions about the S-matrix, which describes what happens when particles of any sort collide, an approach advocated by Werner Heisenberg two decades earlier.
Right after the quark model started to emerge, proposed by Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig in 1964, indicating that hadrons were composed of more elementary particles called quarks, but the prevailing opinion was that quarks were not physical and were just mathematical artifacts.[4]
During the 1967 Solvay Conference, Chew and Gell-Mann presented their theories. Gell-Mann tried to connect the bootstrap model with his quark model. It was the last Solvay Conference on particle physics.[5]
Failure and rebirth
Between 1967 and 1973, deep inelastic scattering experiments at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory confirmed the existence of quarks and the bootstrap model was superseded by the development of quantum chromodynamics.[4][6]
In 1969, the bootstrap procedure was used by Gabriele Veneziano to construct the Veneziano amplitude formula, which led to the development of string theory.[4]
Motivation
The reason the program had any hope of success was because of crossing, the principle that the forces between particles are determined by particle exchange. Once the spectrum of particles is known, the force law is known, and this means that the spectrum is constrained to bound states which form through the action of these forces. The simplest way to solve the consistency condition is to postulate a few elementary particles of spin less than or equal to one, and construct the scattering perturbatively through field theory, but this method does not allow for composite particles of spin greater than 1 and without the then undiscovered phenomenon of confinement, it is naively inconsistent with the observed Regge behavior of hadrons.
Chew and followers believed that it would be possible to use crossing symmetry and Regge behavior to formulate a consistent S-matrix for infinitely many particle types. The Regge hypothesis would determine the spectrum, crossing and analyticity would determine the scattering amplitude (the forces), while unitarity would determine the self-consistent quantum corrections in a way analogous to including loops. The only fully successful implementation of the program required another assumption to organize the mathematics of unitarity (the narrow resonance approximation). This meant that all the hadrons were stable particles in the first approximation, so that scattering and decays could be thought of as a perturbation. This allowed a bootstrap model with infinitely many particle types to be constructed like a field theory. The lowest order scattering amplitude should show Regge behavior and unitarity would determine the loop corrections order by order.
Many in the bootstrap community believed that quantum field theory, which was plagued by problems of definition, was fundamentally inconsistent at high energies. Some believed that there is only one consistent theory which requires infinitely many particle species and whose form can be found by consistency alone. This is nowadays known not to be true, since there are many theories which are nonperturbatively consistent, each with their own S-matrix. Without the narrow-resonance approximation, the bootstrap program did not have a clear expansion parameter, and the consistency equations were often complicated and unwieldy, so that the method had limited success. This led to the development of string theory.
See also
Notes
- ^ Wolchover, Natalie (2019-12-09). “Why the Laws of Physics Are Inevitable”. Quanta Magazine. Retrieved 2026-04-17.
- ^ Chew, G. F. (1959). “Rapporteur’s Talk: Theory of strong coupling of ordinary particles”. Proceedings of the International Annual Conference on High Energy Physics (9): 332–354.
- ^ Jacob, Maurice; Chew, Geoffrey F. (1964). Strong-interaction Physics: A Lecture Note Volume. W.A. Benjamin.
- ^ a b c d e Brink, Lars; Brower, Richard C.; Detar, Carleton; Tan, Chung-i; Phua, Kok Khoo (2021-12-02). Geoffrey Chew: Architect Of The Bootstrap. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-12-1984-9.
- ^ Amaldi, Edoardo; Battimelli, Giovanni; Paoloni, Giovanni (1998). 20th Century Physics: Essays and Recollections : a Selection of Historical Writings. World Scientific. ISBN 978-981-02-2369-4.
- ^ Riordan, Michael (1992-05-29). “The Discovery of Quarks”. Science. 256 (5061): 1287–1293. doi:10.1126/science.256.5061.1287. ISSN 0036-8075.
References
- G. Chew (1962). S-Matrix theory of strong interactions. New York: W.A. Benjamin.
- D. Kaiser (2002). “Nuclear democracy: Political engagement, pedagogical reform, and particle physics in postwar America.” Isis, 93, 229–268.
Further reading
- Wolchover, Natalie (9 December 2019). “Why the Laws of Physics Are Inevitable”. Quanta Magazine.