
The channel wing is an aircraft wing principle that places an engine in the middle of a half-tube driving a propeller placed at the rear end of the channel formed by the half-tube. It was developed by Willard Ray Custer in the 1920s.

Development
In 1925, Custer had observed how strong winds had lifted the roof of a barn. Custer realized that the high velocity of the wind created a lower pressure above the roof while the pressure remained high inside, literally blowing the roof off. This low pressure above/high pressure below is the same phenomenon that allows an airplane wing to provide lift.
Custer studied the phenomenon, and by 1928 had made the first models of a wing with a half-tube section instead of the usual wing profile. He patented the idea in 1929. The half-tube channel wing was then refined further, and on November 12, 1942, the CCW-1 (Custer Channel Wing 1) airplane flew for the first time. Custer built additional experimental aircraft; the last one was CCW-5, of which a few were manufactured in 1964.
Operating principle

Custer’s summary of his invention was that the lift created by a wing is the velocity of the stream of air passing over the wing, not the velocity of the airplane itself: the speed of air, not the airspeed.
A wing functions because the air over the wing has a lower pressure than the air under it. The conventional aircraft must reach a significant minimum speed before this pressure differential become large enough that it generates sufficient lift to become airborne.
In Custer’s channel wing the rotating propeller directs a stable stream of air backwards through the channel. A propeller at the low pressure side is normally be supplied by air from all directions. Since the half-tube prevents air from being drawn from below, the air moves through the channel instead. This creates a low pressure area in the channel, which generates lift.
Applications
The channel wing was not proven in an aircraft for a long time, though Custer showed theoretically and experimentally the principle of vertical flight. His designs were built with conventional rudders that required some airspeed to be functional, so none of the aircraft designed by Custer were capable of vertical takeoff, but instead were characterized as STOL (short takeoff and landing). The required runway for takeoff was remarkably short: 200 feet (61 m) for the CCW-1, 66 feet (20 m) for the CCW-2, with a take off speed of as low as 20 miles per hour (32 km/h). Full vertical takeoff is theoretically feasible.
Custer investigated aircraft with pure channel wings and aircraft with additional conventional wings located outside the channels. The construction functions very well at relatively low speeds. At higher speeds, at high propeller RPM, oscillations occurred in the areas around the propeller, causing increased noise as well as creating long term destructive vibrations in the structure.
The twin engine layout featuring two channel wing features was the most tested configuration. The twin layout had a higher risk of loss of control during a single engine failure situation, and required a high nose up attitude for STOL flight.[1]
Two of Custer’s CCW aircraft survive. CCW-1 is located at the Smithsonian’s National Air & Space Museum in Suitland, Maryland. CCW-5, which was based on the Baumann Brigadier executive aircraft, is exhibited at the Mid-Atlantic Air Museum in Pennsylvania.
Later, research performed by NASA concluded that the advantage in lift and field length performance achieved did not offset the layout’s many deficiencies in climb and high speed ability, and identified problems meeting certification requirements for general aviation.[2] The main issue is that the semi-circular beam wing configuration incurs increased profile drag and weight penalties over a conventional wing of the same lifting planform, and a common straight wing could provide almost the equivalent lift enhancement when exposed to the same slipstream-induced increased dynamic pressure.
Hybrids
From 1999–2004 a joint research project led by Georgia Institute of Technology Research Institute was funded by Langley Research Center. Aircraft were tested using channel wing layouts with circulation control devices that leveraged the Coandă effect. Performance improved and angle of attack was lowered. The resultant design is patented.[1]
VTOL
In 2017, aerospace startup Hop Flyt Inc. was founded around the concept of eVTOL aircraft that use channel wing technology to achieve vertical flight. The flagship aircraft Venturi, named after the Venturi Effect, is a conceptual canard aircraft that allows the angle of incidence of the channel wing to vary, enabling the aircraft to achieve hover, transition, and fixed wing flight. A patent was issued in 2020.[3][4] The company targets the remote resupply market. It claims that its unmanned aerial vehicle offers 90% lower operational cost and 50-fold CO
2 reductions in a VTOL with an 800 mile range and 250 lb payload.[5]
Examples
| Model | Designer | Company | approximate year |
|---|---|---|---|
| CCW-1 | Willard Ray Custer | Custer Channel Wing Corporation | 1942 |
| CCW-2 | Willard Ray Custer | Custer Channel Wing Corporation | 1948 |
| CCW-5 | Willard Ray Custer | Custer Channel Wing Corporation | 1953–64 |
| RFV-1 | Hanno Fischer | Rhein-Flugzeugbau, Mönchengladbach | 1960 |
| Antonov 181 | Oleg Antonov | Antonov | 1990 |
| Cyclone | Neil Winston | HopFlyt | 2026 |
References
- ^ a b Wright, Tim (May 2007). “That little extra lift”. Air and Space/Smithsonian. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) - ^ Clements, Harry R. (2006-08-30). “The Channel Wing Revisited”. SAE International. SAE Technical Paper Series. 1. doi:10.4271/2006-01-2387. ISSN 2688-3627. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
- ^ US-10696390-B2, 2020-06-30, Winston, Robert, Aircraft having independently variable incidence channel wings with independently variable incidence channel canards https://ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/10696390
- ^ US 10696390
- ^ Landes, Al (2026-04-08). “Century-Old Aviation Breakthrough Finally Takes Flight in 2027”. Gadget Review. Retrieved 2026-04-09.
Further reading
- Liska, Donald (March 1953). “Channel Wing Aircraft”. The Wisconsin Engineer. 57 (6): 16–19, 44. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
- Brown, Kevin (September 1964). “Cockpit-Testing the Legendary Channel-Wing”. Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) - Englar, Robert; Campbell, Brian (2002). Development of Pneumatic Channel Wing Powered-Lift Advanced Super-STOL Aircraft. 1st Flow Control Conference 24–26 June 2002. St. Louis, Missouri: AIAA. pp. 2002–3275. doi:10.2514/6.2002-3275.
- Boyne, Walt (May 1977). “The Custer Channel Wing Story”. Airpower Magazine. Vol. 7, no. 3. pp. 8–19, 58. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) - “Custer’s Production Model Takes Bow”. Air Progress Magazine. October 1964. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) - “Channel Wing Flown in Demonstration”. Aviation Week. Washington D.C. 1959-09-28. Retrieved 2022-05-27.
{{cite magazine}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link)
External links
- Custer-Channelwing Website Archive
- Another Custer Channel Wing Website
- Video of Custer explaining his theories and actual flight footage
- Pictures of the Custer CCW-1 National Air and Space Museum
- Pictures of the Custer CCW-5 Mid-Atlantic Air Museum, Reading, Pennsylvania
- Modern channelwing aircraft design Stavatti Aersopace designed channelwing transport for the 2000s
- Custer’s Channel Wing