In the mathematical field of category theory, the product of two categories C and D, denoted C × D and called a product category, is an extension of the concept of the Cartesian product of two sets. Product categories are used to define bifunctors and multifunctors.[1]
Definition
The product category C × D has:
- as objects:
- pairs of objects (A, B), where A is an object of C and B of D;
- as arrows from (A1, B1) to (A2, B2):
- pairs of arrows (f, g), where f : A1 → A2 is an arrow of C and g : B1 → B2 is an arrow of D;
- as composition, component-wise composition from the contributing categories:
- (f2, g2) o (f1, g1) = (f2 o f1, g2 o g1);
- as identities, pairs of identities from the contributing categories:
- 1(A, B) = (1A, 1B).
A product of a family of categories is defined exactly the same way.
Universal property
Just like for sets, a product of a family of categories is characterized by the following universal property. Given categories indexed by a set , satisfy:
- given a family of functors , there exists a unique functor such that for each .
Put in another way, a product of a family of small categories is exactly the categorical product of them in the category of small categories . Thus, for example,
Functoriality
Given two functors , the product is defined component-wise; that is,
for a pair of objects and a pair of morphisms .[3] (This product may also be characterized by the universal property similar to that for categories.) This way, we get the functor
It satisfies the tensor-hom adjunction in the sense
where denotes a functor category.[4]
Example: C × 2
Let be functors. Suppose there is a natural transformation . Then determines the functor
such that
- ,
where is the category with two objects and the non-identity morphism .[3] Intuitively, h is a non-invertible homotopy from to . Indeed, define by, for in ,
Conversely, given , we get by and .[5]
Bifunctor
A functor whose domain is a product category is called a bifunctor. A bifunctor can be defined in each variable separately in the following sense:
Proposition—[6] Each bifunctor
determines the families of the functors, for objects in and in ,
given by
- and
for and similarly for . They commute in the sense:
- .
Conversely, given families of functors as above, if they commute, they define the bifunctor by
- .
For example, consider . For each fixed in , we have the functor
by pullback; i.e., goes to the function
defined by . On the other hand, is defined by pushforward; i.e., . Clearly, these two functors commute (the associativity of composition) and so, by the proposition, we get the functor called the Hom functor
which is explicitly given as:
There is a similar result for natural transformations between bifunctors:
Proposition—[7] Let be bifunctors and
a family of morphisms. Then is a natural transformation if and only if it is natural in the first variable and the second variable separately; i,e., for each object in ,
is a natural transformation and similarly in the second variable.
References
- ^ Mac Lane 1978, p. 37.
- ^ Mac Lane 1978, Ch. II., § 5., Exercise 2.
- ^ a b Mac Lane 1978, Ch. II., § 3.
- ^ Mac Lane 1978, Ch. II., § 5., Exercise 1.
- ^ Mac Lane 1978, Ch. II., § 4., Exercise 8.
- ^ Mac Lane 1978, Ch. II., § 3., Proposition 1.
- ^ Mac Lane 1978, Ch. II., § 3., Proposition 2.
- Definition 1.6.5 in Borceux, Francis (1994). Handbook of categorical algebra. Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications 50-51, 53 [i.e. 52]. Vol. 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 22. ISBN 0-521-44178-1.
- Product category at the nLab
- Mac Lane, Saunders (1978). Categories for the Working Mathematician (Second ed.). New York, NY: Springer New York. pp. 36–40. ISBN 1441931236. OCLC 851741862.