Sample Page

Protuberum was a traversodontid cynodontian from the Middle Triassic of Brazil[2] known from a single species, P. cabralense.[1] It is most notable for its thickened skull and ribs, vertebrae and illium covered in bony bumps from which it gets its name, and was among the largest triassic cynodonts.

Discovery and naming

The first specimen of Protuberum was collected in 1977. It consists of several ribs and vertebrae. The second, collected in 1989, consists of a partial articulated skeleton and a skull with most of the dentition still present. Both were collected by Father Daniel Cargnin. Additional specimens were discovered including thoracic (chest) ribs, a proximal (close to the midline) fragment of a right cervical (neck) rib, an ulna (one of the two bones of the lower arm), and two humeri (lower arm bones).[2][3] In 2009 they were described by a team consisting of Míriam Reichel and colleagues. The second specimen was made the holotype.[2]

The genus name refers to the large amount of protuberances on the ribs and ilia (part of the hip), while the species name is in honor of the Municipality of Novo Cabrais, where the type specimen was collected.[2]

Description

Protuberum was a large traversodontid, with the holotype subadult specimen weighting about 60.35 kg (133.0 lb), and other, probably adult specimens being 40% larger.[4][5]

Skull and teeth

The cranium was big, measuring about 20 cm (7.9 in) long, sporting a short and high parietal crest, 15 millimetres (0.59 in) long or only 7.5% or the skull’s length. The preorbital bones, lambdoid crest and the skull roof are thick, making the skull overall very robust.[2] This robustness along with the large size of the skeletal elements indicate that the holotype individual was probably a subadult.[3]

On the upper jaw, Protuberum had four incisors, one canine, and postcanines on each side. The incisors are large and point slightly forward, and have a thick coat of enamel on the labial surface (= the side touching the lips), with the largest being the third incisor. The canines are not preserved, with only a single scrap of a tooth remaining, although the fourth incisor was originally misinterpreted as a canine. The paracanine fossa (a depression on the upper jaw to accommodate the canines of the mandible when the mouth is closed) is larger than that of other traversodontids, and was originally interpreted a being so extensive it would create a uniquely long diastema (gap) between the canine and postcanine teeth, although this was later rejected. The postcanine teeth possess two cusps connected by a sharp transverse process. Unlike Massetognathus, Exaeretodon and some other gomphodonts, they lack a shouldering pattern. They are worn sequentially from the front of the mouth back, indicating that the postcanines erupted from the back of the mouth over time. However they likely did not move as new teeth grew, as indicated by a straight root.[2][5]

Postcranial skeleton

Protuberum is most striking for its neural spines, presacral ribs and illium which are covered in bumps. Analogous rib ornaments are found in the ankylosaur Spicomellus and the pseudosuchian Euscolosuchus, although in the former they are epidermal.[6][7] Thrinaxodon had a similar condition with a series of tubercules on the proximal ribs.[8] Kayentatherium was another cynodont with bump-like vertebral processes.[2][9] On the illium they are present on the iliac blade, above the hips, and are aligned with the bumps of the ribs. These bumps are made of compact bone tissue, possibly pachyostotic, and were most likely not covered in cartilaginous tissue.[2]

Like with other cynodonts, the ribcage can be separated into two distinct regions, thoracic and lumbar, based on the presence of costal plates. The thoracic region bears overlapping costal plates, where the proximal half of each rib is widened. Each rib is lined with a single row of bumps, which decrease in size distally (away from the midline), so that the largest are the near the spine. The longest middle thoracic ribs bear up to eight of these processes, and their number generally decreases with the length of the rib.[2]

Classification

In the first phylogeny ran in 2009, Protuberum was recovered deeply nested within Gomphodontosuchinae[2]

In 2024 Protuberum was recovered as outside Gomphodontosuchinae:[5]

Thrinaxodon liorhinus

Cynognathia

Cynognathus crateronotus

Gomphodontia
Diademodontidae

Titanogomphodon crassus

Diademodon tetragonus

Neogomphodontia

Langbergia modisei

Trirachodon berryi

Sinognathinae

Cricodon metabolus

Beishanodon youngi

Sinognathus gracilis

Traversodontidae

BP_1_5538

CGP_100

Etjoia dentitransitus

Scalenodon ribeiroae

Scalenodon angustifrons

Pascualgnathus polanskii

Andescynodon mendozensis

Rosieria delsatei

Habayia halbadieri

Microscalenodon nanus

Mandagomphodon attridgei

Mandagomphodon hirschoni

Luangwa sudamericana

Luangwa drysdalii

“Traversodontinae”

Paratraversodon fransiscaensis

Traversodon staleckeri

Protuberum carabalense

Gomphodontosuchinae

Gomphodontosuchus brasiliensis

Menadon Brazil

Menadon Madagascar

Proexaeretodon vincei

Siriusgnathus niemeyerorum

Santagnathus mariensis

Exaeretodon riograndensis

Exaeretodon argentinus

Scalenodontoides macrodontes

Paleobiology

The anterior (front) portion of the iliac blade is strongly curved, giving more surface for muscle attachment and indicating that strong hindlimb muscles would have been present in life. This is suggests the presence of powerful hindlimbs and may point toward burrowing habits. This is also supported by the high cortical thickness of the ribs, which is characteristic of aquatic or burrowing mammals.[2][10] As is typical for traversodontids, protuberum was a specialized herbivore with teeth adapted for grinding vegetation, and may have used its powerful limbs to dig out roots. While the use of the bumps is not clear, these alongside the thickened skull and costal plates have been suggested to be defensive or burrowing adaptations.[2]

Like other therapsids, Protuberum experienced a very rapid growth in its first years of life. One of the specimens was an adult or close to skeletal maturity based on the thick skull and wide patches of peripheral lamellar bone in the ulna, and shows continuous growth until maturity like other non-mammalian cynodonts.[10]

Paleoecology

Protuberum was found in the lower Dinodontosaurus Assemblage Zone of the Santa Maria Formation of Brazi, in the ‘Sítio Cortado’ an ‘Rincão do Pinhal’ outcrops.[2][11][5] It would have lived alongside the traversodontids Exaertodon,[12] Luangwa,[13] Massetognathus,[13] Scalenodon,[14] and Traversodon,[15] the probainognathians Aleodon,[16] Bonacynodon,[17] Candeariodon,[18] Chiniquodon,[19] and Protheriodon, the kannemeyeriiform dicynodonts Dinodontosaurus and Stahleckeria, the rhynchosaur Brasinorhynchus,[20] the proterchampsiids Retymaijychampsa[21] and Pinheirochampsa,[22] the pseudosuchians Archeopelta,[23] Decuriasuchus,[24] Dynamosuchus,[25] Pagosvenator,[26] Parvosuchus,[27] Prestosuchus,[28] Procerosuchus,[29] and Schultzsuchus,[30] the silesaurids Gamatavus[31] and Gondwanax,[32] the aphanosaur Spondylosoma,[33] and the owenetiid procolophonoid Candelaria[34]

In the Triassic, the Santa Maria Formation would have been a arid to semi-arid environment, with long dry seasons and shorter wet seasons, comprising ephemeral lakes.[35] The Dinodontosaurus Assemblage Zone represented a mudflat, and would have been wetter than later environments.[36]

References

  1. ^ a b The specific name cabralense is “necessarily emended from the original P. cabralensis because Protuberum is a neuter generic name”. Kammerer, Christian F. (2014). “Chapter 10. Theriodonta: Introduction”. In Christian F. Kammerer; Kenneth D. Angielczyk; Jörg Fröbisch (eds.). Early Evolutionary History of the Synapsida. Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. p. 167. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6841-3_10.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Reichel, Míriam; Schultz, Cesar Leandro; Soares, Marina Bento (2009). “A New Traversodontid Cynodont (therapsida, Eucynodontia) from the Middle Triassic Santa Maria Formation of Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil”. Palaeontology. 52 (1): 229–250. Bibcode:2009Palgy..52..229R. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4983.2008.00824.x. ISSN 1475-4983.
  3. ^ a b Veiga, Fábio Hiratsuka; Botha-Brink, Jennifer; Soares, Marina Bento (2018-02-21). “Osteohistology of the non-mammaliaform traversodontids Protuberum cabralense and Exaeretodon riograndensis from southern Brazil” (PDF). Historical Biology: 1–11. doi:10.1080/08912963.2018.1441292. ISSN 0891-2963.
  4. ^ Kaiuca, João Felipe Leal; Martinelli, Agustín Guillermo; Schultz, Cesar Leandro; Fonseca, Pedro Henrique Morais; Tavares, William Corrêa; Soares, Marina Bento (2024). “Weighing in on miniaturization: New body mass estimates for Triassic eucynodonts and analyses of body size evolution during the cynodont-mammal transition”. The Anatomical Record. 307 (4): 1594–1612. doi:10.1002/ar.25377. ISSN 1932-8494. PMID 38229416.
  5. ^ a b c d Schmitt, Maurício Rodrigo; Martinelli, Agustín Guillermo; Fonseca, Pedro Henrique Morais; Schultz, Cesar Leandro; Soares, Marina Bento (2024). “Craniodental reinterpretations and new specimens of Protuberum cabralense, a bizarre traversodontid cynodont from the earliest Late Triassic of Brazil”. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 149 105213. Bibcode:2024JSAES.14905213S. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2024.105213. hdl:11336/261815. ISSN 0895-9811.
  6. ^ Maidment, Susannah C. R.; Strachan, Sarah J.; Ouarhache, Driss; Scheyer, Torsten M.; Brown, Emily E.; Fernandez, Vincent; Johanson, Zerina; Raven, Thomas J.; Barrett, Paul M. (2021). “Bizarre dermal armour suggests the first African ankylosaur”. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 5 (12): 1576–1581. Bibcode:2021NatEE…5.1576M. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01553-6. ISSN 2397-334X. PMID 34556830.
  7. ^ Scheyer, Torsten M.; Sues, Hans-Dieter (2017-01-02). “Expanded dorsal ribs in the Late Triassic pseudosuchian reptile Euscolosuchus olseni”. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 37 (1) e1248768. Bibcode:2017JVPal..37E8768S. doi:10.1080/02724634.2017.1248768. ISSN 0272-4634.
  8. ^ Jenkins, Farish (1971). “The postcranial skeleton of African cynodonts: Problems in the early evolution of the mammalian postcranial skeleton”. Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History (36).
  9. ^ SUES, HANS-DIETER (1985). “The relationships of the Tritylodontidae (Synapsida)”. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 85 (3): 205–217. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb01503.x. ISSN 0024-4082. Archived from the original on 2020-03-24.
  10. ^ a b Botha, Jeniffer; Abdala, Fernando; Chinsamy-Turan, Anusuya (2012). “The radiation and osteohistology of non-mammaliaform cynodonts”. The Forerunners of Mammals: Radiation. Biology. Histology. Indiana University Press. p. 239. ISBN 978-0-253-35697-0.
  11. ^ Veiga, Fábio Hiratsuka; Botha-Brink, Jennifer; Soares, Marina Bento (2019-10-21). “Osteohistology of the non-mammaliaform traversodontids Protuberum cabralense and Exaeretodon riograndensis from southern Brazil”. Historical Biology. 31 (9): 1231–1241. Bibcode:2019HBio…31.1231V. doi:10.1080/08912963.2018.1441292. ISSN 0891-2963.
  12. ^ Liu, Jun (2007). “The taxonomy of the traversodontid cynodonts Exaeretodon and Ischignathus. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia. 10 (2): 133–136. Bibcode:2007RvBrP..10..133L. doi:10.4072/rbp.2007.2.07.
  13. ^ a b Barberena, M.C.; Araújo, D.C.; Lavina, E.L. (1985). “Late Permian and Triassic tetrapods of southern Brazil”. National Geographic Research.
  14. ^ Melo, Tomaz P.; Martinelli, Agustín G.; Soares, Marina B. (2017). “A new gomphodont cynodont (Traversodontidae) from the Middle–Late Triassic Dinodontosaurus Assemblage Zone of the Santa Maria Supersequence, Brazil”. Palaeontology. 60 (4): 571–582. Bibcode:2017Palgy..60..571M. doi:10.1111/pala.12302. ISSN 1475-4983.
  15. ^ Barberena, Mario (1981). “Novos Materiais de Traversodon Stahleckeri da Formação Santa Maria (Triássico do Rio Grande do Sul)”. Pesquisas em Geociências (in Portuguese). 14 (14): 149–162. doi:10.22456/1807-9806.21737. ISSN 1807-9806.
  16. ^ Martinelli, Agustín G.; Kammerer, Christian F.; Melo, Tomaz P.; Paes Neto, Voltaire D.; Ribeiro, Ana Maria; Da-Rosa, Átila A. S.; Schultz, Cesar L.; Soares, Marina Bento (2017). “The African cynodont Aleodon (Cynodontia, Probainognathia) in the Triassic of southern Brazil and its biostratigraphic significance”. PLOS ONE. 12 (6) e0177948. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1277948M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177948. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5470689. PMID 28614355.
  17. ^ Martinelli, Agustín G.; Soares, Marina Bento; Schwanke, Cibele (2016). “Two New Cynodonts (Therapsida) from the Middle-Early Late Triassic of Brazil and Comments on South American Probainognathians”. PLOS ONE. 11 (10) e0162945. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1162945M. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162945. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 5051967. PMID 27706191.
  18. ^ Oliveira, Téo Veiga De; Schultz, Cesar Leandro; Soares, Marina Bento; Rodrigues, Carlos Nunes (2011). “A new carnivorous cynodont (Synapsida, Therapsida) from the Brazilian Mid-dle Triassic (Santa Maria Formation): Candelariodon barberenai gen. et sp. nov”. Zootaxa. 3027 (1): 19–28. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.3027.1.3. ISSN 1175-5334.
  19. ^ Von Huene (1936). “Die Fossilien Reptilien des südamerikanischen Gondwanalandes an der Zeitenwende (Denwa-Molteno-Unterkeuper = Ober-Karnisch)” [The fossil reptiles of South American Gondwana during the temporal transition) (Denwa-Molteno-Upper Triassic = Upper Carnian)]. Ergebnisse der Sauriergrabungen in Südbrasilien 1928/29 (Results of the excavations in South Brazil 1928/29, part II.): 93–159.
  20. ^ Schultz, Cesar Leandro; Langer, Max Cardoso; Montefeltro, Felipe Chinaglia (2016-09-01). “A new rhynchosaur from south Brazil (Santa Maria Formation) and rhynchosaur diversity patterns across the Middle-Late Triassic boundary”. PalZ. 90 (3): 593–609. Bibcode:2016PalZ…90..593S. doi:10.1007/s12542-016-0307-7. hdl:11449/161986. ISSN 1867-6812.
  21. ^ Müller, Rodrigo (2025). “A new proterochampsid archosauriform from the Middle‑Late Triassic of Southern Brazil”. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 70. doi:10.4202/app.01204.2024. ISSN 0567-7920.
  22. ^ Paes-Neto, Voltaire D.; Lacerda, Marcel B.; Ezcurra, Martín D.; Raugust, Tiago; Trotteyn, María J.; Soares, Marina B.; Schultz, Cesar L.; Pretto, Flávio A.; Francischini, Heitor; Martinelli, Agustín G. (2024). “New rhadinosuchine proterochampsids from the late Middle-early Late Triassic of southern Brazil enhance the diversity of archosauriforms”. The Anatomical Record. 307 (4): 851–889. doi:10.1002/ar.25294. ISSN 1932-8494. PMID 37589539.
  23. ^ Desojo, Julia B.; Ezcurra, Martin D.; Schultz, Cesar L. (2011). “An unusual new archosauriform from the Middle–Late Triassic of southern Brazil and the monophyly of Doswelliidae”. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (4): 839–871. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00655.x. hdl:11336/160636. ISSN 1096-3642.
  24. ^ França, Marco Aurélio G.; Ferigolo, Jorge; Langer, Max C. (2011-05-01). “Associated skeletons of a new middle Triassic “Rauisuchia” from Brazil” (PDF). Naturwissenschaften. 98 (5): 389–395. Bibcode:2011NW…..98..389F. doi:10.1007/s00114-011-0782-3. ISSN 1432-1904. PMID 21445632.
  25. ^ Müller, Rodrigo; von Baczko, M. Belén; Desojo, Julia; Nesbitt, Sterling (2020). “The first ornithosuchid from Brazil and its macroevolutionary and phylogenetic implications for Late Triassic faunas in Gondwana”. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 65: 2019. Bibcode:2020AcPaP..65.2019M. doi:10.4202/app.00652.2019. hdl:11336/127725. ISSN 0567-7920.
  26. ^ Lacerda, Marcel B; de França, Marco A G; Schultz, Cesar L (2018-10-20). “A new erpetosuchid (Pseudosuchia, Archosauria) from the Middle–Late Triassic of Southern Brazil”. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 184 (3): 804–824. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zly008. ISSN 0024-4082.
  27. ^ Müller, Rodrigo T. (2024-06-20). “A new small-sized predatory pseudosuchian archosaur from the Middle-Late Triassic of Southern Brazil”. Scientific Reports. 14 (1) 12706. Bibcode:2024NatSR..1412706M. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-63313-3. ISSN 2045-2322. PMC 11189902. PMID 38902259.
  28. ^ Barberena, Mario Costa (1978-06-30). “A Huge Thecodont Skull From The Triassic of Brazil”. Pesquisas em Geociências (in Portuguese). 9 (9): 62–75. doi:10.22456/1807-9806.21780. ISSN 1807-9806.
  29. ^ Gower, David J. (2000-11-29). “Rauisuchian archosaurs (Reptilia, Diapsida): An overview” (PDF). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie – Abhandlungen. 218 (3): 447–488. Bibcode:2000NJGPA.218..447G. doi:10.1127/njgpa/218/2000/447.
  30. ^ Desojo, Julia B.; Rauhut, Oliver W. M. (2024). “Reassessment of the enigmatic “Prestosuchus” loricatus (Archosauria: Pseudosuchia) from the Middle-Late Triassic of southern Brazil”. The Anatomical Record. 307 (4): 974–1000. doi:10.1002/ar.25401. ISSN 1932-8494. PMID 38344898.
  31. ^ Pretto, Flávio Augusto; Müller, Rodrigo Temp; Moro, Debora; Garcia, Maurício Silva; Paes Neto, Voltaire Dutra; Da Rosa, Átila Augusto Stock (2022-12-01). “The oldest South American silesaurid: New remains from the Middle Triassic (Pinheiros-Chiniquá Sequence, Dinodontosaurus Assemblage Zone) increase the time range of silesaurid fossil record in southern Brazil”. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 120 104039. Bibcode:2022JSAES.12004039P. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2022.104039. ISSN 0895-9811.
  32. ^ Müller, Rodrigo Temp (2025-01-01). “A new “silesaurid” from the oldest dinosauromorph-bearing beds of South America provides insights into the early evolution of bird-line archosaurs”. Gondwana Research. 137: 13–28. Bibcode:2025GondR.137…13M. doi:10.1016/j.gr.2024.09.007. ISSN 1342-937X.
  33. ^ Nesbitt, Sterling J.; Butler, Richard J.; Ezcurra, Martín D.; Barrett, Paul M.; Stocker, Michelle R.; Angielczyk, Kenneth D.; Smith, Roger M. H.; Sidor, Christian A.; Niedźwiedzki, Grzegorz; Sennikov, Andrey G.; Charig, Alan J. (2017). “The earliest bird-line archosaurs and the assembly of the dinosaur body plan” (PDF). Nature. 544 (7651): 484–487. Bibcode:2017Natur.544..484N. doi:10.1038/nature22037. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 28405026.
  34. ^ Cisneros, Juan C.; Damiani, Ross; Schultz, Cesar; da Rosa, Átila; Schwanke, Cibele; Neto, Leopoldo W.; Aurélio, Pedro L. P. (2004-07-22). “A procolophonoid reptile with temporal fenestration from the Middle Triassic of Brazil”. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 271 (1547): 1541–1546. Bibcode:2004PBioS.271.1541C. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2748. PMC 1691751. PMID 15306328.
  35. ^ Rodrigues, Isaque C.; Maraschin, Anderson J.; Borba, André W.; Mizusaki, Ana M. P. (2024-11-15). “Geochemistry of fine-grained sedimentary rocks: Implications for source area, paleoweathering, paleoclimate, and provenance of the Santa Maria Formation (Triassic, Paraná Basin, Brazil)”. Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 148 105167. Bibcode:2024JSAES.14805167R. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2024.105167. ISSN 0895-9811.
  36. ^ Corecco, Leonardo; Pereira, Vitor Paulo; Soares, Marina Bento; Schultz, Cesar Leandro (2020-01-01). “Geochemical study of the vertebrate assemblage zones of the Santa Maria Supersequence (Middle to Late Triassic), Paraná Basin, Brazil”. Brazilian Journal of Geology. 50 (4) e20200014. Bibcode:2020BrJG…50E0014C. doi:10.1590/2317-4889202020200014.