Sample Page

Snap Judgments: New Positions in Contemporary African Photography was a 2006 exhibition curated by Okwui Enwezor which exhibited from March 10 to May 28 at the International Center of Photography (ICP) in New York. It presented recent work by African photographers and artists working across photography, video, installation, and performance documentation. The exhibition followed Enwezor’s earlier project In/Sight (1996) and broadened its scope beyond portraiture to include different lens-based practices. It featured more than 200 works by artists from Africa and the diaspora, and examined themes of identity, urbanisation, colonial legacies, and global interconnections. The exhibition was widely discussed for its challenge to Western visual stereotypes of Africa, its critique of “Afro-pessimism“, and also its presentation of multiple perspectives on African identity and photographic practice.

The exhibition was organised by Nigerian-born curator and art historian Okwui Enwezor, who had previously co-curated In/Sight: African Photographers, 1940 to the Present (1996) at the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum in 1996.^[1][2] That earlier project focused on portraiture and modern African self-representation, and accentuated studio traditions and the collaborative nature of portrait photography.^[1][2]

Enwezor had “championed the cause of African photography for more than ten years” following the success of In/Sight, advocating a shift away from “the unilateral viewpoint imposed by Western media” toward “a more intimate view of the African continent” grounded in lived experience.^[3] Snap Judgments was conceived a decade later as a distinct curatorial initiative, concentrating “almost entirely on work from the last five years”.^[1] It was Enwezor’s first project as adjunct curator at the International Center of Photography (ICP).^[4]

The exhibition’s premise was shaped by Enwezor’s critique of “Afro-pessimism“, a term he used to describe the tendency of global media to depict Africa primarily through images of “war, disease, poverty, heartbreak and nothing else”.^[1] This concern reflected broader debates about photography’s role in constructing reductive views of Africa in Western visual culture.^[5] The exhibition was intended as an intervention, confronting “the redundant ‘African’ imaginary propped up by much of global media” and presenting African photographers as active agents reclaiming representation from “the touristic gaze”.^[3][6]

It also responded to the limited number of large-scale international exhibitions of African photography, despite earlier shows such as the Guggenheim’s 1996 survey and Africa Remix (2008).^[7] Snap Judgments brought together more than 200 works by about 35 artists from over a dozen countries, many exhibiting internationally for the first time.^[8][7] The artists represented a generation largely born during or after the independence era of the 1960s and were described as “linked by their generation more than anything else”.^[1][3] The thematic scope included national identity in relation to colonial histories, urbanisation, global media and technology, and representations of the body, as well as “individuals’ place in society” and “stories about the larger world, documentary and otherwise”.^[4][3]

The exhibition was presented at the International Center of Photography in New York and included more than 200 works by approximately 35 artists from over 12 countries.^[8][7] Most of the works were produced within the five years preceding the exhibition and included photography, video, installation, and performance-based documentation.^[8][4] It comprised “over 180 objects” and works by artists from Africa and its diasporas.^[3]

The exhibition addressed multiple intersecting concerns, including “the representational and epistemological frameworks of exhibiting itself”, the “pathological relationship between Africa and the mythmaking capabilities of photography”, the role of the archive, and the emergence of a “third space” for contemporary lens-based practices.^[9] It was also premised on the understanding of the museum as “a key ideological apparatus” involved in producing social realities and subjectivities of the modern world.^[10] The project positioned exhibition-making itself as a rhetorical and discursive practice, described as “braided narratives with purposes, fictions of persuasion, or docudramas of influence”.^[11]

Works were loosely organised into themes including landscape, urban life, the body and identity, and history and representation.^[12] The exhibition explored issues such as identity, race, gender, historic trauma, political narratives, globalisation, and everyday life in postcolonial contexts.^[8][7] It also examined tensions between documentary photography, staged imagery, and “post-documentary” or “antiphotogenic” practices.^[13]

Erin Haney and Erika Nimis, art historians and curators specialising in the history of African photography, describe the exhibition as presenting a “satisfyingly disruptive array of visions” with “no overarching spin”, including themes of “loss and the transformation of memory”, diaspora, and “quotidian life” in cities such as Cairo, Lagos, and Johannesburg.^[3]

The exhibition included artists such as Nontsikelelo “Lolo” Veleko, Mikhael Subotzky, Guy Tillim, Zarina Bhimji, Theo Eshetu, Andrew Dosunmu, Tracey Rose, and others.^[2][14] Works ranged from fashion and street photography to prison documentation, cityscapes, archival interventions, and experimental video.^[2][4] Examples included Romuald Hazoumé‘s Kpayoland (2004) series addressing global oil economies, Bhimji’s images of abandoned spaces linked to Ugandan history, and Subotzky’s prison photographs examining institutional life.^[2]

Additional works discussed include Allan de Souza’s rephotographed family snapshots addressing degradation and memory, Bhimji’s imagery invoking displacement, and Eshetu’s footage of Mount Zuqualla depicting religious pilgrims and armed guards.^[3] Portraiture included Sada Tangara’s images of sleeping street boys, Veleko’s portraits of Johannesburg youth, and Tracey Rose‘s “subversions of Biblical standards as lush fantasy narratives”.^[3] Other works depicted institutional and industrial environments, including images by Ali Chraibi and Hentie van der Merwe, and also Subotzky’s “panoramas of jailhouse interiors” showing South African prisoners and guards.^[3]

Elizabeth Harney described the exhibition as engaging “a much broader set of politics” beyond a survey of contemporary African photography, including exhibitionary frameworks, archival practices, and postcolonial visuality.^[9] She argued that the works questioned “inherent practices of viewing” and the reliance on visuality to construct “realities”.^[15] Harney further noted that the exhibition foregrounded the archive as central to modern subjectivity and explored contemporary efforts to interrogate its conditions.^[16] She also emphasised the exhibition’s engagement with “Afropessimism” and its attempt to reposition Africa within global discourses through a cosmopolitan imaginary.^[10]

The exhibition was described as an intervention into historical visual regimes, including ethnographic photography, and anthropological gazes.^[11] Harney highlighted tensions between documentary truth-value and constructed imagery, noting debates over meaning, authorship, and interpretation within photographic practice.^[17]

Mark Stevens of the New York magazine wrote that in the United States, Africa is often seen through Western-produced images such as “villagers in mud huts, apartheid, Soweto, famine, exotic animals, tribal violence”, and that the exhibition presented work “resolutely by and about Africans”.^[14] He described the images as appearing “fresh and somehow unburdened, at once postcolonial and post-ideological”.^[14] Stevens stated that Veleko’s photographs of Johannesburg fashion presented “bursting contemporary colors” that disrupted preconceived images of South Africa.^[14] He also noted works by Zwelethu Mthethwa, Subotzky, and Tillim as challenging stereotypes of miners, prisons, and urban life.^[14]

Holland Cotter of The New York Times wrote that most global perceptions of Africa are “filtered through images of calamity”, describing the exhibition as a “bracing antidote” to “Afro-pessimism”.^[1] He characterised the exhibition as “stimulating, astringent, brimming with life” and noted its emphasis on postcolonial perspectives and recent work.^[1] Cotter also emphasised the shift from portraiture toward cityscapes and conceptual practices.^[1]

Cindi Di Marzo of Studio International stated that the exhibition resisted reductive media portrayals of Africa as defined by poverty, war, and disease, presenting instead complex and individualised perspectives.^[4] She noted that the works addressed themes including identity, urbanisation, colonial history, and global interconnectedness.^[4]

Kristin M. Jones of Frieze wrote that Africa’s relationship to photography has been “fraught” in Western media and that the exhibition highlighted photography as a “versatile critical tool” for postcolonial artists.^[5] She described the exhibition as resisting a “neat package” and presenting layered, analytical, and sometimes anti-photogenic approaches.^[5]

Isolde Brielmaier of Aperture described the exhibition as presenting Africa as “both undeniably local and absolutely global in its scope”.^[2] She stated that the exhibition documented “the cultures and locales that comprise this vast and varied continent” and underscored Africa’s engagement with global systems.^[2]

Publishers Weekly described the catalogue as a “thought-provoking introduction” that challenged “Afro-pessimism” and reclaimed African representation from the “touristic gaze”. It noted that the exhibition demonstrated how artists engaged with international art while maintaining distinct perspectives.^[6]

Stephen Frailey of Artforum wrote that the exhibition attempted to comprehend African contemporary art through “broad geopolitical and cultural diversity” and promised to “reframe our understanding of African photography”.^[8]

The Week described the exhibition as “wonderful in its creativity and powerful in its message”, reiterating Cotter’s characterisation of it as a response to “Afro-pessimism.” The review noted that the exhibition presented a “slow, complex, panoptical turn in perspective” and emphasised its postcolonial orientation.^[18]

Bill Kouwenhoven of Ei8ht magazine described the exhibition as “a great leap forward” in presenting African photography internationally and emphasised its diversity of perspectives and media. He noted that it challenged Western imagery focused on war, famine, and crisis, instead presenting varied “platforms” including conceptual, documentary, and political work.^[7]

Haney and Nimis wrote that the exhibition sought to provide “an antidote to the redundant ‘African’ imaginary” and offered “an introduction to compelling imagery moving beyond” earlier canonical photographers.^[3] They described the selection as uneven in presentation, noting that works by Subotzky, Mthethwa, and Tillim “completely overwhelmed” other displays, while artists such as Luis Basto and the collective Depth of Field were less prominently presented.^[19] They also observed disparities in display formats between small unframed prints and larger, prominently installed works.^[19]

Haney and Nimis also discussed issues of representation, including the prominence of South African artists, the balance of female photographers, and the positioning of artists within international art networks.^[19] They noted broader structural conditions affecting African photography, including marginalisation outside South Africa and limited local audiences for events such as the Bamako biennale.^[19]

Adrian R. Duran, an art historian specialising in Modern and Contemporary arts, described the exhibition as “both invigorating and infuriating, critically incisive and ethically complex”, producing an experience that “oscillate[s] between the profoundly satisfying and the profoundly unsettling”.^[20] He typified its scope as both “demonstrable and delusional” while emphasising the “remarkable” diversity of artists and practices.^[20] He then noted that the exhibition raised unresolved questions about the concept of Africa itself, invoking “Which Idea of Africa?” as a central concern.^[20]

Duran wrote that the works reflected “historical, cultural, and theoretical densities” and encouraged viewers to consider how Africa has been represented in relation to Western perspectives.^[21] He brought out Subotzky’s prison series as depicting “group labor, cramped living quarters, drug abuse, and the plodding mechanisms of institutional correction”.^[22] He also discussed Veleko’s portraits in relation to global fashion and post-apartheid identity, and Zohra Bensemra‘s images as combining “human warmth” with “slumbering danger”.^[23] He went on to examine landscape and urban imagery, including Otobong Nkanga‘s photographs of abandoned buildings as combining “landscape and memento mori“.^[24] He stressed the “familiarity” of many images and stated that they undermined assumptions of difference between Africa and Western contexts.^[25]

Some critics described the exhibition as an “uneven survey show” attempting to construct a metahistory of African photography.^[26] Harney argued that critiques of representation could miss the broader agenda, which framed Africa as a contested identity rather than a fixed geography.^[10]

Stevens observed that any exhibition attempting to represent Africa’s diversity would “inevitably appear somewhat unfocused”.^[14] He added that “a blurred succession of glimpses” could help dismantle fixed preconceptions.^[14]

Jones noted that the exhibition resisted coherence and instead emphasised multiplicity and complexity.^[5] Duran similarly questioned the possibility of treating “Contemporary African Photography” as a unified category, describing the term as conceptually unstable and composed of multiple “permutations“.^[20]

The exhibition was accompanied by a 383‑page catalogue published by ICP/Steidl, which included an essay by Okwui Enwezor contextualising the works and addressing issues of representation and Afro‑pessimism.^[6]

The exhibition travelled to Miami Art Central in 2006 and to the Memphis Brooks Museum of Art in 2008.^[19][20] The exhibition has been described as contributing to the repositioning of African photography within global art discourse and as part of broader efforts by Enwezor and others to increase its international visibility.^[7] It has also been cited as an example of exhibition-making as a form of critical and activist practice engaging with postcolonial representation and visual culture.^[10]