Sample Page

Hello! Welcome to DPL bot’s talk page! This page is for bug reports and feature requests. To contact the bot’s owner, please click here.
For questions about the dablinks template, please visit the DPL WikiProject, or read the Dablinks FAQ.
For questions about a disambig notification you received, please visit the DPL WikiProject, or read the User Notification FAQ.

Citation template

The citation template I have used for years to site articles in medical journals in PubMed such as I used for IFI44L which I recently published has not been working all day. When I click on Wikit (going to https://citation-template-filling.toolforge.org/cgi-bin/index.cgi?ddb=&type=pubmed_id&id=25052386&add_param_space=1&add_ref_tag=1&full_journal_title=1) I get an error message “Can’t call method “findnodes” on an undefined value at /data/project/citation-template-filling/perl/ActivePerl-5.26/site/lib/WWW/Search/PubMedLite.pm line 117″. Can you please help me correct this? Thank you. (talk) 22:41, 1 March 2025 (UTC)…..Yesterday afternoon, the citation template started working.(talk) 4:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate this bot so much

I appreciate this bot so much. Thanks to whoever made it. Helps make articles I edit better! SamuelNelsonGISP (talk) 16:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wording is off in some cases

I noticed that the wording of the bot message for disambiguation notifications can be inaccurate. It states that “you added a link pointing to X”, even in cases where the article was simply reverted to an older version that contained the link. In that case, while it was my edit, it wasn’t really “me” adding it, and insinuating that can be patronizing and make the bot seem faulty. I would suggest changing to the more passive wording of “a link was added pointing to X”, which seems to be all that the bot can actually detect, as it doesn’t have the capability to compare to past history and say things like “an older link was restored that is now incorrect”. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 08:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the correction notice regarding a disambiguation to an internal link to “Amazon” in my recent uploaded expansion of the page devoted to stage and film actress “Anne Cornwall”. In reviewing my references for my expansion, I see only one link to Amazon, one in reference or footnote #18 as “Amazon“. Does this relate to the error cited? I do specify in that reference the link to the company itself and not just generally and incorrectly as simply “Amazon. Please clarify. Thanks again. Strudjum (talk) 14:53, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Spacing bug in user-talk notice

See for example [1] in the recent bot run that says “the disambiguation page was Conformationadded“. There should be a space between the page-name and the word “added” so that it gives “the disambiguation page was Conformation added” DMacks (talk) 08:04, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Still happening. It should be “the disambiguation page Tramway was added”.
Error (talk) 22:32, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed Thanks! —R’n’B (call me Russ) 14:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your help 🙂 42sweethomescholar (talk) 20:41, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Buzin…..

In my opinion Buzin is totally irrelevant in the Croatia Airlines page…. Settignano (talk) 09:59, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am confused. If you think it’s irrelevant, why did you add the link to the article? Also, why do you think the bot has anything to do with this? —R’n’B (call me Russ) 14:07, 25 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Do you really think that mentioning Buzin together with Zagreb is important? How many readers care of?
What is bot? board of trade? Settignano (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]