Sample Page

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 121, 122, 123

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 31 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 4.

Hello Doniago. Thank you for your message regarding the Jeff Stryker Talk page.

I am Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton), the subject of the Jeff Stryker article. I removed a comment from the Talk page and wish to explain my reasoning clearly and in good faith.

The comment I removed stated that I was married to a named private individual. I removed it for the following policy-based reasons:

• The comment was entirely

 unsourced — no reliable published 
 source was cited in support of 
 the claim

• It concerned my private marital

 status, which I have never 
 publicly confirmed and which 
 I maintain as entirely private

• It named a private individual

 in connection with me without 
 their consent

• WP:BLPTALK states that

 Talk pages must not contain 
 material that would be 
 inappropriate in the article 
 itself — an unsourced claim 
 about a living person's private 
 marital status would clearly 
 not belong in the article

I acknowledge that Talk page comments should generally be preserved and I understand why my removal triggered your concern. However I believe WP:BLP and WP:BLPTALK support the removal of unsourced contentious material about private personal matters even from Talk pages.

I am committed to editing this article constructively and in full compliance with Wikipedia policies. I have disclosed my conflict of interest at User:Charlescpeyton and am working to improve the article with properly cited sources.

I welcome any guidance you can offer and am happy to discuss further if needed.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton) Charlescpeyton (talk) 16:14, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. However, with regards to editing the article itself, I will maintain that while it’s likely okay for you to make minor edits, any substantial changes are best made by you requesting an edit on the Talk page that’s then implemented (or not) by editors who do not share your COI. You may want to try to keep your requests fairly simple and compartmentalized; the easier it is for other editors to figure out what you’d like changed, the faster the changes are likely to get made. In other words, requesting the addition of a single sentence is likely to go faster than requesting the addition of five paragraphs. Which isn’t to say you can’t ultimately make all of the requests you feel are necessary to improve the article; I’m speaking from a standpoint of what may be the most productive approach you can take.

Assuming you really are who you say you are (no offense intended; editors have few ways to be sure that other editors really are who they claim they are), I suppose it would be cliched for me to claim I was a big fan, heh.

Sorry if you got a level of pushback here that may have made you feel unwelcome. Unfortunately there’s a significant history of editors with conflicts of interest trying to edit their own articles in their own flagrant self-interest, so we have policies to try to prevent that, and experienced editors can come off as a bit dubious of editors claiming to be celebrities. DonIago (talk) 16:23, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Doniago. Thank you for your guidance regarding WP:COIEDIT.

I have reviewed the policy and wish to respond respectfully and in good faith.

I am Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton), the subject of the Jeff Stryker article and the registered trademark holder of Jeff Stryker™ — a United States trademark active since 1986. Jeff Stryker is not only my professional name but a registered commercial brand that I own, control, and license exclusively. This gives me unique authoritative firsthand knowledge of the brand’s commercial history that no other editor can fully verify from published sources alone.

I understand and accept that Wikipedia does not grant editorial control on the basis of trademark ownership, and I am not claiming such control. Going forward I will use the Talk page to propose significant changes and invite neutral editors to implement them, reserving direct edits only for clear WP:BLP violations requiring immediate action.

Regarding the Talk page comment I removed — it stated I was married to a named private individual. I removed it because it was entirely unsourced, concerned my private marital status which I have never publicly confirmed, named a private individual without consent, and directly violated WP:BLPTALK which prohibits Talk page content that would be inappropriate in the article itself. I believe this removal was correct under Wikipedia policy though I acknowledge I should have left an explanatory note rather than removing silently.

I have disclosed my conflict of interest fully at User:Charlescpeyton and am committed to working constructively within Wikipedia’s guidelines.

I welcome any further guidance you can offer.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Charles Casper Peyton (User:Charlescpeyton) Charlescpeyton (talk) 16:25, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Charles; I think my response to the earlier thread covered everything I have for advice to offer at this time. The biggest issue is that as an editor with a COI you shouldn’t make substantial edits to the article about you, but rather request them via the Talk page. You seem to understand that at this point, which is awesome, and I (and I’m sure other editors) appreciate you being candid about your conflict of interest.

Happy to try to help if you have any specific questions/concerns unrelated to specific edits to the article in question. DonIago (talk) 16:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You win. I’m out. Congratulations. 3charles3 (talk) 06:04, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot’s talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
22		The Way Things Work (TV series) (talk)	Add sources
19		Red Army (novel) (talk)	Add sources
80		The Gospel of John (2003 film) (talk)	Add sources
294		Rupert (TV series) (talk)	Add sources
58		Maugrim (talk)	Add sources
302		Mr. Tumnus (talk)	Add sources
831		Alice Krige (talk)	Cleanup
110		Wendy Torrance (talk)	Cleanup
66		Out of the Unknown (talk)	Cleanup
90		Riding the Bullet (film) (talk)	Expand
439		Soviet Armed Forces (talk)	Expand
195		Edmund Pevensie (talk)	Expand
227		Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
86		The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (1979 film) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,024		Bob the Builder (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
373		Particle (talk)	Merge
3		Jacksonville Expressway Authority (talk)	Merge
206		AZP S-60 (talk)	Merge
59		Semyon Krivoshein (talk)	Wikify
142		Fix-up (talk)	Wikify
96		Grigory Kulik (talk)	Wikify
3		Christine Reid (talk)	Orphan
2		CVN45502 (talk)	Orphan
8		Ashraf Garda (talk)	Orphan
8		The Conrad Boys (talk)	Stub
12		Fire Song (talk)	Stub
73		234th Guards Air Assault Regiment (talk)	Stub
60		Skellington Productions (talk)	Stub
210		Josh Friedman (talk)	Stub
40		Allison Abbate (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you’ve edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot’s talk page. — SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Horton Hears a Who! (film), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style’s guidance on dates. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:55, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The Bronx Zoo now has panther chameleons in the Madagascar! exhibit! And the vasa parrots are lesser, not greater. And the pygmy marmosets at the Congo Gorilla Forest have been removed permanently. ~2026-30456-85 (talk) 14:51, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure why you’re telling me this? I haven’t edited the article since April. DonIago (talk) 14:55, 20 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Roger Ebert’s review talks about the ending. There is also an unsourced mention of the scene in the Plot section of the page. I’ll go through and add a few more inline citations there as well. Sorry about not sourcing my earlier edit (and forgetting to sign in). Question, on a film page page, can you reference the film itself with a timestamp maybe? On book pages, you can reference the book, especially when it comes to specific quotes and plot, but I’m less familiar with film. —Zujine|talk 18:38, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You shouldn’t need to add references to the plot per WP:FILMPLOT. The film itself should be sufficient sourcing, as long as the plot section isn’t making any claims that aren’t evident from the film itself.

I don’t see why you couldn’t reference the film with a timestamp using Template:Cite AV media, though I’m not sure what your intentions are/why you feel you’d need to? DonIago (talk) 19:19, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the insight. I was asking about citing the film directly because at first I had trouble finding a source that talked about the ending in order to cite my earlier edit about the setting appearing again at the end. It was just a general inquiry in case I found myself wanting to add something to a film page where I can’t find a third-party source that addresses something shown in the film. I appreciate you taking the time to reply. Thanks again. —Zujine|talk 17:13, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Requested information on why my warning on the suicide page was removed 9yasono (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not to include that kind of content has been discussed extensively enough in the past that there’s a notice about it on the Talk page for the article. Thus far the consensus has been not to do so. DonIago (talk) 16:47, 28 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot’s talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
389		Faisal I (talk)	Add sources
72		A Dangerous Man: Lawrence After Arabia (talk)	Add sources
1,052		Sykes–Picot Agreement (talk)	Add sources
140		Siege of Medina (talk)	Add sources
172		Robert Bolt (talk)	Add sources
67		Percy Cox (talk)	Add sources
37		Modern history of Saudi Arabia (talk)	Cleanup
22		Beneath You (talk)	Cleanup
2		D32 road (Croatia) (talk)	Cleanup
356		Aqaba (talk)	Expand
10		Timeline of Ottoman Syria history (talk)	Expand
6		1918 in British-administered Palestine (talk)	Expand
940		Baptism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
6		Clola (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
265		Meles Zenawi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
4		Ctenobethylus oblongiceps (talk)	Merge
214		Sukanta Bhattacharya (talk)	Merge
14		Thai QR Payment (talk)	Merge
100		Cold Case season 7 (talk)	Wikify
1		Colaspis recurva (talk)	Wikify
17		Battle of Otterlo (talk)	Wikify
2		Almaz Garifullin (talk)	Orphan
4		Christian A. Meissner (talk)	Orphan
2		Artem Iliukhin (talk)	Orphan
5		Lawrence After Arabia (talk)	Stub
11		Rosario Pisani (talk)	Stub
5		Muhammed Sharif al-Faruqi (talk)	Stub
84		Nafud desert (talk)	Stub
262		Tafas massacre (talk)	Stub
8		1879 Princeton Tigers football team (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you’ve edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot’s talk page. — SuggestBot (talk) 00:08, 1 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot’s talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
690		17 Again (film) (talk)	Add sources
206		VR Troopers (talk)	Add sources
209		In Bloom (talk)	Add sources
707		Fahrenheit 9/11 (talk)	Add sources
113		Ghost (musical) (talk)	Add sources
64		Karl Agathon (talk)	Add sources
40		Blood on the Scales (talk)	Cleanup
259		Spider-Man (Japanese TV series) (talk)	Cleanup
166		GoBots (talk)	Cleanup
180		Gaius Baltar (talk)	Expand
109		Stitches (2012 film) (talk)	Expand
19		Unfollow the Rules (talk)	Expand
227		Lilith Sternin (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
161		William Adama (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
29		The Ties That Bind (Battlestar Galactica) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
175		Spoiler effect (talk)	Merge
39		Outline of the Pacific War (talk)	Merge
6		Hatfield Moors (talk)	Merge
2,788		Jennifer Ehle (talk)	Wikify
117		Gibsons (talk)	Wikify
225		Galactica 1980 (talk)	Wikify
2		Natalio Cirilo Banegas (talk)	Orphan
5		Pablo Murgier (talk)	Orphan
2		Calathus amplior (talk)	Orphan
25		Alfredo Le Pera (talk)	Stub
14		Mi Buenos Aires querido (song) (talk)	Stub
55		Short Shorts (talk)	Stub
7		El día que me quieras (film) (talk)	Stub
11		Rondo in C for Violin and Orchestra (Mozart) (talk)	Stub
17		Volver (song) (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you’ve edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot’s talk page. — SuggestBot (talk) 00:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you seft revert the articles Friday the 13th, Friday the 13th Part 2, Friday the 13th Part III, and Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter to fix the fix and add missing categories American crime horror films and English-language crime horror films merge categories JessieBottoms (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If it’s possible can you also add teen horror film related categories to them and other films ones with teenagers JessieBottoms (talk) 19:34, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t believe I’ve ever edited more than one of those articles, so I can’t self-revert changes I didn’t make. I’d be happy to look at any diffs that concern you if you can provide them and explain why you feel they should be reverted, though. DonIago (talk) 19:41, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You did Friday the 13th Part 5 JessieBottoms (talk) 19:42, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Simply replace English-Language crime film category with a more fitting merge category English-language crime horror film because they are still Crime and teen horror films need to add categories to prove it change and add JessieBottoms (talk) 19:45, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Plus they’re American that makes them American crime horror films can you add that Category to them too? JessieBottoms (talk) 19:46, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I Already knew you reverted American crime horror films and English-language crime horror films Categories back on the Friday the 13th Part 5 article that was correct. JessieBottoms (talk) 19:48, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Since they’re still horror films want the categories to be correct JessieBottoms (talk) 19:50, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Can you also add more teen horror film film related categories 80s, 90s, and 2000s cause the stories takes place around teenagers JessieBottoms (talk) 19:53, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Only ones that need them. JessieBottoms (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, but you just threw a lot of various things at me. If you’d like to write a single paragraph clearly explaining what changes you’d like me to make and to which article(s), I’ll consider it. But why not ask at the article’s Talk page(s)? DonIago (talk) 19:54, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

People tried to edit them but I heard there’s issues with a User:Ponyo he always reverts articles back incorrectly and gets that editor blocked just because they’re trying to do the right thing. JessieBottoms (talk) 19:57, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I guess it would have to a professional to edit. JessieBottoms (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo is very arrogant all he does it block users accused them of someone like Jinnifer he’s using the Jinnifer thing as an excuse. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:00, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You can just do one film article at a time. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:01, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Becarful Ponyo can be anyone he’s tricky and manipulative. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:02, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I meant anywhere. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:03, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Because Friday the 13th films are still horror film it’s important to have Categories to relate you can add the American horror films Category to the first four film and replace the English-language crime films Category with the English-language crime horror films Category since it does exist. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:07, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between crime film and crime horror film it that crime films focus on the rational execution and investigation of the law or illegal acts, whereas crime horror films prioritize visceral terror, gore, and dread, often featuring unstoppable or supernatural threats that defy the bounds of typical human bounds. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:17, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why you can’t make these changes? DonIago (talk) 20:18, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The first four Friday the 13th films are just like that type of crime horror same thing with a nightmare on Elm Street add Category:American crime horror films them and also replace Category:English-language crime films with Category:English-language crime horror films JessieBottoms (talk) 20:20, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I just explained JessieBottoms (talk) 20:21, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I would change them myself but I’m afraid to because Ponyo might catch me and the Friday the 13th Part III article is locked JessieBottoms (talk) 20:22, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It’s unfair how he treats users JessieBottoms (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

He’s making new user feel afraid. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:28, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If that’s the case then you need to discuss it with them or at the Talk page for one of the articles where they’re engaging in this behavior. I’m not comfortable getting dragged into your edit conflict when it doesn’t appear that you’ve made any effort to communicate with them first. DonIago (talk) 20:36, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I added a comment to the Friday the 13th Part III talk page but I doubt anyone will read it. JessieBottoms (talk) 20:43, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If I go ahead and edit part 1 2 and 4 myself can you edit part 3? JessieBottoms (talk) 20:50, 15 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]