Sample Page

There are presently 8 Harv errors in this article – Refs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8. Please fix these 8 citing errors so the article will no longer be in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. – Shearonink (talk) 05:52, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Is it a strategy to avoid organizing new elections? Panam2014 (talk) 15:52, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to the results of any national or sub-national election. This is a standard message to inform you that the results of any national or sub-national election is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:51, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Spanish government formation is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit — Reconrabbit (talk) 22:22, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Second W. Misick ministry when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:47, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Spanish government formation has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit — Reconrabbit (talk) 22:06, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2016 Spanish general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style’s guidance on dates. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:03, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page April 2019 Spanish general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style’s guidance on dates. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:04, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article 2023 Spanish government formation has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit — Reconrabbit (talk) 17:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Opinion polling for the next Spanish general election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style’s guidance on dates. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Tobby72 (talk) 12:11, 17 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You ask why the Ashcroft poll was deleted. He always does it. Jakefolds2 is the user whose edit warring back in December was responsible for getting this article protected for a year. Yet he was back after a few days and has repeatedly deleted Ashcroft polls, which he regards as unreliable and biased. Meanwhile, I and others like me are locked out for the rest of the year. This is making a mockery of Wikipedia protection policy, which is not fit for purpose. See Talk:Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election#Deletion of Lord Ashcroft Poll and User talk:Jakefolds2. ~2026-13144-75 (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1987 Castilian-Leonese regional election, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style’s guidance on dates. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:05, 4 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this change, please raise your concerns about the consensus to undo “Government” easter egg at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/Linking#Easteregg:_link_to_specific_cabinet_behind_”Government”. – Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 00:25, 12 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised your concerns there. – Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 01:11, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And I have apologized there as well. – Butwhatdoiknow (talk) 17:39, 14 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2023 Spanish general election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Liberal was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 22:39, 15 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited November 2019 Spanish general election, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Equality was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 21:38, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1979 Spanish local elections, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Island council was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1987 Spanish local elections, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orense was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 17 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This new user has been active on the infoboxes of left wing parties. I reverted the edit to Sumar, because it had no source and the consensus should be on left, with explanations of sources mentioning far or centre left.

However, I am less sure about the edits to the PCE and IU. They have removed references saying far left, and replaced it with one source (academic, yes) saying just left. I don’t know enough about the subject or the sources, but it seems a particularly bold first edit, and maybe a compromise should be taken that gives due weight to all sources. The argument that parties that take part in elections are not “far” in their beliefs has also been bludgeoned by supporters of Vox, AfD, Front National for years now. Unknown Temptation (talk) 11:38, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Qwerty123M (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening,

I was considering substituting some templates you’ve created like the following:

• {{Alternative scenario opinion polling for the April 2019 Spanish general election}}
• {{Opinion polling for the April 2019 Spanish general election (Graphical summary)}} (used on 2 pages)
• {{Party opinion polling for the April 2019 Spanish general election}}

Same goes for other similar ones.

My basic reason is one-use templates are unnecessary. In general, the fewer templates, the easier a page (and the wiki overall) is to maintain. With page-specific templates, it’s harder to keep the page contents correct, because they rely on two pages. If a citation breaks on the template, it’s less noticeable and requires understanding two pages to fix.

I fixed this citation issue, for example. —Retro (talk | contribs) 20:20, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Retro Thank you for the notice. Ok, let me check, these templates were created many years ago and I think some of the reasons that justified them no longer applied. I will be merging some of their content back into the main articles wherever possible so that this is done in an orderly way. Impru20^talk 08:03, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mayor-Presidents of the autonomous cities of Spain has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category’s entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:35, 21 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

for Opinion polling for the 2026 Peruvian general election and 2026 Colombian presidential election, both potential run-offers should be colored. Panam2014 (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polling for the next Spanish general election

There are two surveys that are not reflected in the survey chart: the CIS (Target Point) and the CIS (Ateneo del Dato). Mentoss740 (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve completely reworded my question on election notability, and changed it from a potential RfC to just a regular old discussion. However, your comments are still relevant, so I’ve left them in there, unchanged. Thanks for taking the time to join in! Commandant Quacks-a-lot (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Impru20 – I’ve closed your filing at AN/I with no action and the following comment: “Howard the Duck has acknowledged and is held to understand proper use of PROD; Impru is requested to consider that a challenge to “up the ante” does not necessarily require a response that ups the ante.” Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 10:28, 8 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Impru20 – your nomination statement included this: “Further, the article was created while a discussion on a similar topic was taking place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Iloilo City local elections (which has since resulted in Deletion, for GNG and SIGCOV reasons).” It might well be a factual statement, but it has no relevance to the question of the notability of the 2025 Iloilo City local elections article and imputes negatively (casts an aspersion) on the intentions of the creator of the article. In your AN/I filing a number of contributors noted the tone of your responses; I’d encourage you to reflect on that (as with my closing comment) and remember less can quite often be more. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 01:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Goldsztajn: Accusing someone of casting aspersions and of raising the temperature in an ongoing discussion is unnecessarily inflamating. I see that, far from just dropping it after my polite remark that I did not like such appreciation, you chose to double down on your statements, which seems weird if your intention is really to avoid “raising the temperature”: so far, it is you the only one who have gone personal over this issue, and you the one who keeps “raising the temperature” in the discussion, so I am kindly asking you (for a second time) to stop. The AfD comes directly as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2028 Iloilo City local elections, so yes, that is why I mentioned it. And yes, I felt that was necessary precisely because there is a direct connection. I did not mention anything else other than content and Delete arguments (GNG and SIGCOV), nor any other user, yet you have somehow assumed this is an aspersion for some reason. Please, assume good faith. Thank you and regards. Impru20^talk 07:12, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Andalusian regional election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Andalusian regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Obi2canibe (talk) 20:33, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Aragonese regional election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Aragonese regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Obi2canibe (talk) 20:35, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Castilian-Leonese regional election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Castilian-Leonese regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Obi2canibe (talk) 20:37, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Next Extremaduran regional election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Extremaduran regional election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

Obi2canibe (talk) 20:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]