Sample Page

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20

Your good article nomination of the article Upton Park tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 11:36, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to have to ask so explicitly, but my renom for Robert Jacomb-Hood, which has been through a PR, hasn’t received any attention since it was nominated on Wednesday, while more recent nominations have. I am working on your three most recent GAN nominations, so in return, please may you help with my nomination, as I want to clear space and workload to nominate the articles I want to work on during the Core Contest. Thank you for your time, JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 16:47, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I will try next week. MRSC (talk) 08:31, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dagenham East rail crash is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 17:32, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Upton Park tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dagenham East rail crash has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 18:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bromley-by-Bow tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 19:02, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bromley-by-Bow tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MRSC BBB is my local, I can pop down and get a photo of the LTSR supports for you… when the train service is next running! Turini2 (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful! Thank you. MRSC (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

here you go! https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LTSR_supports_reverse.jpg and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LTSR_supports_front.jpg Turini2 (talk) 17:43, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A glorious photo. Thank you. MRSC (talk) 18:40, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Upton Park tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 20:06, 5 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bromley-by-Bow tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Dagenham East rail crash has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 17:02, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Plaistow tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 10:34, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Plaistow tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 21:44, 7 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Plaistow tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 10:44, 8 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Coat of arms of Greater London is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna — LunaEatsTuna (talk) 22:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Coat of arms of Greater London has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna — LunaEatsTuna (talk) 01:21, 12 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Coat of arms of Greater London has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna — LunaEatsTuna (talk) 00:22, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Whitechapel and Bow Railway is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 13:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The on hold message doesn’t seem to be delivering, so I here I am saying it’s On hold. It’ll probably come through soon anyway. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 15:18, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Whitechapel and Bow Railway has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 15:26, 19 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Whitechapel and Bow Railway has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 14:46, 21 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bow Road tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 — Bgsu98 (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Stepney Green tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 07:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Stepney Green tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 18:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

 Template:Infobox UK place has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox settlement. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template’s entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 20:47, 25 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As someone making massively positive contributions to tube station articles, do you have any thoughts on the actions of the editor who is mass-editing tube station articles to create short sentences in the lead and replace infobox image captions? I must admit it’s bugging me but I’m wondering if I should just get a life and let it slide? 10mmsocket (talk) 10:16, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t let it consume your time, that’s my advice. You’ll end up feeling frustrated. I try not to get involved in these minor changes where the article is very short or will need substantial rewriting anyway, unless the information introduced is plain wrong. Otherwise it will occupy too much of my time that could be better spent. MRSC (talk) 10:29, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good advice – although I did revert just now which plain wrong. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I see it got a bit much for you! If there’s no improvement I’m going ANI on competence and will seek a topic ban. 10mmsocket (talk) 15:45, 30 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’m satisfied that he should not be editing. MRSC (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Bow Road tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bgsu98 — Bgsu98 (talk) 10:21, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, not sure if you’re still handling this template, but it’s behaving oddly. At Chiswick for instance, it returns a citation like

“Great Britain Historical GIS / University of Portsmouth, Chiswick parish (historic map). Retrieved {{{accessdate}}}.”

would be great if this could be fixed. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll have a look. When the VOB website is working normally again. MRSC (talk) 12:50, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Stepney Green tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 14:46, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Aldgate East tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 15:01, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article St Mary’s (Whitechapel Road) tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 15:06, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Facepalm thanks for the fix on Richmond, London! Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:11, 26 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Aldgate East tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 06:21, 27 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Aldgate East tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 17:21, 28 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 1 § BD9 until a consensus is reached. Mathguy2718 (talk) 01:51, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I’ve not managed to review all your GANs as I’m really busy irl. I will see if I can do them all today but no promises. I have a copy of the book Why Do Shepherds Need a Bush?, which gives the etymology of all London Underground station names and some national rail stations. I think it’s a really nice detail and some of your District Line articles do have station naming reasons in them. What would you think about me adding the etymology to all these articles, except the really simple ones (e.g. Westminster is named after the area, duh)? I’m wary of making 200+ of these edits without any consensus so wanted to know what you thought. JacobTheRox^{(talk | contributions)} 11:40, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, don’t worry about that. Plenty of time to review these. I have that book. I also have Harris, What’s in Name? I think I was put off using these because the first place I looked up, Elm Park, wasn’t a very satisfactory explanation. Hilliam says “This name speaks for itself”. Harris says “takes it’s name from natural local woodland”. But the name according to sources specific to the place say it was devised by Costain for the housing development and comes from Elm Farm on which it was built (the “park” bit is a typical developer marketing). So, my advice is to use these sources only in conjunction with other sources specific to the site for a sense check. For older names the problem might be competing interpretations. MRSC (talk) 13:24, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page stalker jumping in for a second. I only think this would be useful for stations that are not named after the place where they are (very obviously) located. Quickly looking down the List of London Underground stations I am drawn to Barons Court, Roding Valley, Stamford Brook, and Temple. Otherwise I would think that the toponymy belongs in the place after which the station is named. Sorry if I’m missing the point somehow. 10mmsocket (talk) 13:37, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article St Mary’s (Whitechapel Road) tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 13:25, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article St Mary’s (Whitechapel Road) tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 21:05, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article West Ham station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 21:46, 3 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be interested in Popward – constant low quality additions, and ignoring concerns by other editors. Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 09:20, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:London stations without latest usage statistics 0708 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:05, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:London stations without latest usage statistics 0809 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article West Ham station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of JacobTheRox — JacobTheRox (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

For CAT:DUPARGS violations… Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 05:46, 19 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Protected squares has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category’s entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gjs238 (talk) 23:46, 23 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You’re receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Mile End tube station is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jacksonvil — Jacksonvil (talk) 09:44, 6 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Mile End tube station has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jacksonvil — Jacksonvil (talk) 07:24, 7 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Mile End tube station has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the “Did you know” section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else’s nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jacksonvil — Jacksonvil (talk) 02:24, 9 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

On the recent change to the Executive arrangements article, what I noticed is that the 2026 devolution is already mentioned in its own section, and details what the changes are, so the change you made to the committee subsection seems a bit redundant. But it also seems to contradict it a bit. Do you agree? It sounds as if it very much will force most operating under that arrangement to change to leader & cabinet and that only a minority won’t be forced to change, immediately. And even in that case, I think those forced to review their committee arrangement implies that they want them moved to leader & cabinet and that the “review” is the means by which to pressure them to do that.

What do you think? Should we just leave mention of the 2026 reforms in the section dedicated to that? Criticalthinker (talk) 06:46, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn’t spotted that unreferenced section. Will take a look. Thanks for letting me know. MRSC (talk) 06:47, 11 June 2026 (UTC)[reply]