Shirt a Phobia

Sample Page

FAC

Hi Pbritti! Is your review for the FAC still ongoing? I don’t mean to haste you, but I was just wondering when your review might be ready. Thank you so much :)! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 21:59, 3 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nudge. Camilasdandelions (✉️) 01:14, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Camilasdandelions: I’m currently parted from my laptop. I am hoping to complete the review asap (tomorrow is possible, but Thursday is more likely). Doing the review from my phone would be a disservice to your hard work. I’m inclined to believe the article will be promoted far more quickly than many FACs are! Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 21:28, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for the kind words! Please take your time :). Camilasdandelions (✉️) 21:42, 10 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Pbritti Nudge, hope you’re doing well! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 01:11, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the most recent ping—I’m still mostly on mobile for the next few days so your message earlier got buried under other pings. I’ll be with my laptop for most of the day starting in about a hour and should have a couple hours free before actual work begins. Expect replies to your most recent alterations on the FAC but also be aware that it’s fairly likely that I’ll return with a support. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:41, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Pbritti Thank you, I appreciate it! Camilasdandelions (✉️) 22:00, 18 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

There’s no finer way to show one’s appreciation than a “thank you” note (even if I have also written about the pursuit of a button click).

Thanks again for a thorough review. Regarding the Kindness tree, the DT mentions it here: The young royals had stopped at the Kindness tree outside the abbey’s great west door and hung messages on its branches in dedication to someone who has supported them during their lives.

People magazine also notes: Outside the Abbey, Princess Kate walked past the “Kindness Tree,” where guests are invited to dedicate a decoration to someone who has been a source of support in their lives.

I hope that clarifies things. Let me know if I can assist with the prose or images of any other article. I currently have an open PR as well. Cheers. MSincccc (talk) 04:17, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see all this! Always happy to help out. I’ll be on the move a fair bit over the next couple weeks due to real-world responsibilities, but please feel welcome to re-up the PR request here on my talk page if I haven’t gotten to it in a week. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:19, 17 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you are doing well. Just re-upping my PR request as suggested—no worries if you’re busy. Any comments would be appreciated. Thanks. MSincccc (talk) 07:41, 26 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Editions in Christianity in Lebanon

Hello, I see you’re using nonsensical arguments to delete my edit on “Christianity in Lebanon.” First, you literally said “No improvements,” which you didn’t explain, and then you changed your argument. Next, you mentioned my edit on the “Catholic Church” page, which is irrelevant, and I already addressed my confusion on its respective page. Then you said sources were missing, and when I added them (sources that are actually approved on other pages), you deleted them, arguing that I should check WP:ONUS ​​and WP:V. The first one is relevant, and if you want, we can try consensus on the page (and I hope you’ll use some minimal argument), and the second one, as I said, I used sources that have already been used on other pages about Lebanon, such as the Maronites, Languages ​​of Lebanon, Religion in Lebanon, and the respective administrative regions. Lulasaurius (talk) 05:34, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Lulasaurius: frankly, your recently editing has been subpar and reflective of the same behavior that has seen you warned multiple times before. Your decision to call the basis for reverting your edits nonsensical is especially unhelpful. I would strongly encourage you to look into following Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines governing civility, assuming good faith, and consensus-building. If you want to discuss this further, you should use the relevant article’s talk page rather than user pages. ~ Pbritti (talk) 11:19, 3 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I used your user page because it seemed you wanted to address issues beyond that page when you mentioned my edit about the Catholic Church, for which I’ve already clarified my error. Now, regarding my edits, I use arguments and, if necessary, I explain what I do. I don’t simplify my actions to two words or use topics from other pages, especially if I delete someone else’s work (which I almost never do). Recently, since I have little time, I’m focusing more on small details with sources and improving the aesthetics of the pages by organizing them and adding images. Of course, I think it’s a good idea to use the page’s consensus since I see that you, for example, don’t agree with my edit. Now, regarding your opinion on my edits, I recommend you clearly explain your point, and I’ll be happy to improve the edit. Otherwise, anyone who disagrees with something will end up deleting it, and that would be chaos. Lulasaurius (talk) 13:24, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators’ newsletter – April 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2026).

Administrator changes

added
  • ARandomName123
removed
  • Biblioworm
  • Causa sui
  • Djsasso
  • Espresso Addict
  • Fenix down
  • Firefangledfeathers
  • GeneralNotability
  • NawlinWiki
  • Northamerica1000
  • Smalljim

Checkuser changes

removed Giraffer

Oversight changes

added Kj cheetham
removed Giraffer

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the GSCASTE extended-confirmed restriction in the Indian military history case has been narrowed. It now applies to caste-related topics in South Asia, and the preemptive protection remedy has been amended accordingly.
  • The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been closed.
  • The arbitration case Maghreb has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case will close on 7 April.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 6 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Fairfax

Do you have a citation for Justin Fairfax‘s home being in Fairfax County? I cannot find in any of the given sources. —Engineerchange (talk) 14:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Engineerchange: Regardless of specifics, Annandale, Virginia, is part of Fairfax County. I’m presently on the scene and in the middle of uploading an image to the Commons. The development his home is in is called Camelot, which is located within Woodburn, Fairfax County, Virginia. Corrected addresses fall under WP:BLUESKY. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. Didn’t know that detail on corrected addresses, so I’ll take your word on that. I see some details about Camelot Elementary being a slight walk away from the scene, but also see that elementary school is zoned in Anandale, so I’ll trust a local here 🙂 Thanks for your work here! —Engineerchange (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Engineerchange: No problem! It’s a horribly tragic situation and has a ton of BLP elements to it, so caution is a very good thing. If anyone else has questions about this, I’m more than happy to discuss. However, I’m hoping to spend the rest of my day on things healthy for the soul. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 14:27, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be an Annandale address. https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/8106-Guinevere-Dr-Annandale-VA-22003/51840513_zpid/ natemup (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Natemup: And my address squarely within Annandale is sometimes given as Alexandria, Virginia. 8106 Guinevere is within Woodburn. See this map of the CDP’s boundaries. Postal addresses are notoriously wrong. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I could say the same about my address in St. Louis/Sappington. In any case, if Google, the USPS, and the RS say it’s Annandale, it should be Annandale on Wiki, no? natemup (talk) 15:16, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
@Natemup: No, because it’s not in Annandale. I walked over to the house. I’m telling you right now that the address is squarely in Woodburn, not Annandale. Your reasoning hinges on ignoring clear BLUESKY. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t intend to ignore that concept, though it’s perfectly ignorable as it’s an opinion essay, not a policy. Here’s the opposing one that might apply here.
I think that: 1) An address can appear to be in a certain jurisdiction but in reality (i.e., law, taxes, strange city borders, etc.) be otherwise, and 2) All the RS mentioning a city in the Fairfax incident say it’s Annandale, in addition to all legal and property records.
Also, this all should probably be on the talk page of Fairfax, no? We can hardly build consensus here either way. natemup (talk) 15:37, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]
You’re welcome to open this on the article talk page, but I’m telling you, as someone who’s lived here and has had to know the legal boundaries of the local CDPs and Fairfax County districts, the whole of the Camelot development that he lived in is in Woodburn, something that is proved by any examination Annandale’s borders. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 15:39, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Harking upon the Gale

@Pbritti this whole deal is how I learn you’re both a fellow NoVA resident and a W&M grad. Wish it was under better circumstances, but fun to know! The Kip (contribs) 17:03, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@The Kip: Oh, that’s great! Tragedy has a weird way of opening new connections. Please feel extremely welcome to ping me if you ever want to chat about something you think I could help with. Sometime in the next few months (once I’ve worked down my queue a bit), I’ll be further rewriting the Wren Building article. I’m going to be local to Arlington County soon, but I’m happy to travel if there’s ever something you want me to look into. Best, ~ Pbritti (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]