Neocreationism
Hello, I’ve noticed this apparently hasty revert that lacked an edit summary explaining what may have been wrong, so I thought I’d ask you to please revise it. It complied with policy and improved the state of the talk page (signing unsigned posts, removing stale unreplied-to spam, and assembling what may have seem like separate posts but were really one; the history of the page was consulted to fix those, it was not arbitrary). Thanks, ~2026-10830-00 (talk) 13:49, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Closed discussion at Talk:Khmer script
You closed a discussion I initiated at Talk:Khmer script per WP:NOTAFORUM.
Going by WP:TALK (“The purpose of a talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss editing that page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject.”). I’m not sure what the problem is in that I did not express a personal opinion or advocate for another’s opinion. I was asking a question about the article’s (lack of) content before deciding whether to add information. I’m not sure how else I should go about it, but I have replied to a comment there for clarification as to why I was asking. Thanks. — AjaxSmack 17:49, 29 March 2026 (UTC)
Listing for discussion of Template:Mni
Template:Mni has been listed for discussion, which may result in the template being merged or deleted by consensus. You are invited to comment on the proposed action at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Primefac (talk) 10:26, 11 April 2026 (UTC)