Sample Page

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 42 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

I now have a TUSC account!

Hi Peter coxhead. There is a plant article naming convention request at the Help Desk. I saw your name listed at Naming_conventions_(flora) contributions and am hoping you would post your thoughts at How long does speedy deletion usually take?.[1] I asked Pmanderson on the Pmanderson talk page, but not sure if she/he will see the request. Thanks. —

Hey thank you for editing . My friend

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of Salticidae species (2nd nomination). Thanks!

Hello, Peter coxhead. Please check your email; you’ve got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You’ve got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

I’m new to all this but eager to make positive contributions. I just want to thank you for all the work you do here. You’ve removed several of my photos recently but I see that your reasoning is sound. Soryy to make more work for you. I’ll try to be more pertinent and concise in the future. Thanks!

The redirect Giant-rhubarb to the article Gunnera tinctoria has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 18 § Giant rhubarb until a consensus is reached.

yo Peter i saw you connected the variety of Schwenckia Americana and i would like to ask should i also mention all varietieds in the taxonomy bar? Bermensterflora (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Bermensterflora: Since I made Schwenckia americana var. angustifolia into a redirect, I added it to the taxonbar. So the question to ask is: are any of the other synonyms listed in the taxobox worth making into a redirect and then adding to the taxonbar? Have they been treated as distinct taxa in recent years before being synonymized? Certainly there’s no reason to add every synonym to the taxonbar. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:57, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]