Sample Page

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 21 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hey. I want to let you that the 4 sockpuppets you blocked from 03:31 to 03:34 UTC are sockpuppets of Lockdown Louis. I invite you to take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lockdown Louis. The reason I’m messaging you is because Lockdown Louis’s accounts are sockpuppets of Catcreekcitycouncil. The reason I think they are CCCC is that they are adding jokes about lions in Montana, which CCCC is known to do.

EVIDENCE

• Special:Diff/1345074584, Special:Diff/1345074113, Special:Diff/1345440334, and Special:Diff/1345439896 all fit LTA profile; lion jokes
• 38 vandalism edits to Agoura High School, where “LIONS OF CAT CREEK” was repeatedly inserted from 06:36 to 06:56 also fit LTA profile
• The username Montana Mountain Man matches the username format of other CCCC sockpuppets

It’s also recommended that you read Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Catcreekcitycouncil to get a better understanding. Thank you! ~2026-71744-3 (talk) 04:28, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@~2026-71744-3, hi, I actually blocked these as vandalism-only accounts and not as sockpuppets, but @Asilvering is far more in tune and told me that they were socks of someone. I’m fairly busy over the next few days so another admin with more time to look at this would be better to contact at the moment. Sennecaster (Chat) 18:02, 27 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I checked with Asilvering yesterday ~2026-71744-3 (talk) 03:58, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am not someone that frequently goes to SPI – you’d be better off alerting an SPI clerk as they are the ones capable of doing anything about merging the cases in the first place. I’m primarily a copyright editor that happened to be in a place to do asilvering a small favor the other day. Sennecaster (Chat) 04:08, 28 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I note from my watchlist that the wiki page for Barron Field (author) has recently been deleted by you, as a result of it being listed on the Copyright Problems page for over seven days. This is an author in whom I have an interest but checking back though my Watchlist notifications I didn’t see any note on the actual page for Barron Field that it was under a copyright violation notice. Is this the normal practice? I don’t watch the Copyright Page and therefore missed any such listing. If I’d known that such a notification was attached to the page I would have attempted to clean it up. Is there any way we can get this page re-instated so I can work on it? Perry Middlemiss (talk) 05:28, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Perry Middlemiss; if your watchlist is set for a period of 7 days, it won’t appear. The article was listed for about 10 days so the4lines’s initial tagging done by a semi-automated tool called Deputy, and tagged as a “suspected or complicated copyright issue”. Unfortunately, I can’t restore the page for you. It’s almost entirely a copyright violation which is why it was deleted. There is nothing against recreating the article, and here’s the sources.^{[1][2][3][4][5][6][7]}

References

Oh, and here’s the selected works list too. In all honesty, the article was in pretty bad shape prose-wise.

• First Fruits of Australian Poetry (1819), which contains:
  • “Botany-Bay Flowers” (1819)
  • “Kangaroo” (1819)
• “On Reading the Controversy Between Lord Byron and Mr Bowles” (1823)
• “On Affixing a Tablet to the Memory of Captain Cook, and Sir Joseph Banks, Against the Rock of Their First Landing in Botany Bay” (1822)
• “On Visiting the Spot Where Captain Cook, and Sir Joseph Banks, First Landed in Botany Bay” (1822)

Sennecaster (Chat) 12:52, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I’ve now gone back 30 days but still can’t find any notification. I wonder if, because the page is now deleted, that old notifications are now void and are not showing?. Maybe that’s why I don;t see anything.

I’ll utilise the references you’ve supplied. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 21:47, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I don’t watchlist a lot of articles in all honesty and almost nothing that would be deleted so it could be what you’re thinking. Good luck with the article, and hopefully there’s a few more that you can find to bolster the two biography dictionaries. Sennecaster (Chat) 23:20, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Talk:Jaina_seven-valued_logic indicates that you deleted the eponymous page. However I can’t see the deletion listed in your contributions. I am trying to find out why this page (well the article really rather than the talk page) was deleted. Can you please shed any light on this? Morgan Leigh | Talk 23:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Morgan Leigh; the log action for reference. I deleted this as a copyright violation, with the issue described at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 March 21 being valid as a clerk has found and I have affirmed. Since the issue was impossible to separate from the page history with an intact article, I deleted it. Deleted contributions wouldn’t appear in your view to begin with as a non-administrator, but I additionally did not edit the article so checking logs is always the best bet. Sennecaster (Chat) 04:05, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Morgan Leigh and @Sennecaster, I’m a relatively new contributor to Wikipedia. @Sennecaster, thanks for your meticulous work. This article that was deleted is an important one to re-write. Can you please help me do it? And also, can you please help me understand what exactly the copyright violation was that the clerk flagged? What does “being valid as a clerk” mean? Solomonvimal (talk) 15:04, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-Sennecaster/non-clerk comment) Hi, @Solomonvimal! I was the user who originally flagged this at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2026 March 21; hopefully I can provide some extra context :). As a bit of background, the user who originally created this article (and was the primary author, by far) has a history of copyright violations (this is how I found the article in the first place—I was checking their edits for copyvio at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/20240203).

From what I recall, nearly 100% of the article was directly copied from its copyrighted sources (this is both against policy and risks putting Wikipedia in trouble with the law), to the extent that removing the copyright violations would’ve left only a one- or two-sentence stub. I listed the article at the copyright problems noticeboard, where one week is given to allow time for someone to rewrite or remove the copyvio. During that time, the presence of copyvio (and the lack of much salvageable non-copyvio prose) was verified by a copyright clerk, and the article was deleted once the week was up.

Since basically all of it was copyright violations, it probably won’t help you much to see the old article text—you’re better off just going off the copied sources themselves. I’m sure someone from Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles would be happy to send you a list of the sources used in the deleted version :). I agree that this article is important to rewrite, and I see you’ve recreated Jaina seven-valued logic—thank you!

Hopefully that clears things up a little, but copyright (and Wikipedia in general) can definitely be confusing at times—trust me, I know :). GoldRomean (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sennecaster Thanks for posting these references and info. User:Solomonvimal I would love to work on this article with you.Morgan Leigh | Talk 05:13, 16 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Solomonvimal, references from the old version.^{[1][2][3][4][5]} Below is the old further reading section.

• For the implementation of a generic computational argumentation system to Jaina seven-valued logic, see Ohta, Shogo; Hagiwara, Takeshi; Sawamura, Hajime; Riche, Jacques (2013). “Specializing the Logic of Multiple-Valued Argumentation to the Jaina Seven-Valued Logic” (PDF). Proceedings on the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: 1–7. Retrieved 5 June 2022.
• For an exposition of the Jaina concept of logic, see V. K. Bharadwaja (July 1982). “The Jaina Concept of Logic” (PDF). Indian Philosophical Quarterly. IX (4): 362–376. Retrieved 27 November 2016.
• For an exposition stating that Saptabhangi cannot be considered as logic in the modern sense of the word, see Fabien Schang (December 2013). “A One-Valued Logic for Non-One-Sidedness”. International Journal of Jaina Studies. 9 (4): 1–25. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
• For an exposition of Saptabhangi, see Pragati Jain (July 2000). “Saptabhaṅgī: The Jaina Theory of Sevenfold Predication: A Logical Analysis” (PDF). Philosophy East and West. 50 (3): 385–399. Retrieved 28 November 2016.
• For a discussion on Syadvada, see J. B. S. Haldane. “The Syadvada System of Predication”. Jain World. Archived from the original on 16 June 2008. Retrieved 28 November 2016. (Sankhya 18, 195–200, 1957)

References

Sennecaster (Chat) 01:38, 15 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

They seem to have decided their topic ban has ended. Was there a six-month expiry on the tban? I ask you because you closed the AN/I thread. I saw nothing about six months there. If it isn’t expired, they may need a reminder that it won’t expire unless they successfully appeal. [1] They immediately returned to actions that are likely covered by their topic ban. [2] Simonm223 (talk) 17:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I figured it out. They are violating their topic ban but I think it’s because they severely misunderstood some advice they got from a different admin. I gave them a caution that they should avoid violating their topic ban going forward but that’s probably all that is required. Simonm223 (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2026 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		This award is given in recognition of Sennecaster for accumulating at least 10 points in the January–February 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 27,750 articles and 7,050 redirects during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – DreamRimmer ■ 16:48, 4 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

You were the “enforcing administrator” in which my WP:XC privileges were removed. According to the result from my ArbCom enforcement, this right would be removed “until Edittttor has made enough manual non-repetitive edits to earn the right.” I believe that I have now surpassed that threshold and am requesting XC reinstatement. Thanks! Edittttor (talk) 13:03, 11 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Edittttor; Star Mississippi was the one to remove your extended confirmed, not me, and the thread you linked I did not participate in. I am not the enforcing administrator here. I unfortunately do not have the time to help you further, as I am limited only to answering direct talk page queries in terms of time. Sennecaster (Chat) 22:43, 11 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]