Sample Page

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

Hi all! Hoping to get some assistance on the article for Calder Gardens, a recently opened museum in Philadelphia. I did some expansion on the history of the museum’s development and opening, but I’m really not well versed in writing articles with a significant focus on architecture. Given the depth of coverage of the building and its architecture, I think this probably calls for some additional prose describing the style, structure, etc. Does anyone here have capacity to help flesh out an “Architecture” section of this article? There are a lot of reviews already cited or listed under “Further reading” to pull from for descriptions and analysis. Would appreciate any help anyone’s able to provide. Thanks 🙂 19h00s (talk) 18:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Fort Belvedere, Surrey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:37, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

I have nominated Theatre Royal, Drury Lane for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare “Keep” or “Delist” in regards to the article’s featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 18:11, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Andriivskyi Descent has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:44, 24 November 2025 (UTC)

For WikiProjects that participate in rating articles, the banners for talk pages usually say something like:

• “This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.”

There is a proposal to change the default wording on the banners to say “priority” instead of “importance”. This could affect the template for your group. Please join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council#Proposal to update wording on WikiProject banners. Stefen 𝕋ower ^{Huddle • Handiwerk} 19:37, 6 December 2025 (UTC) (on behalf of the WikiProject Council)

I’ve drafted an article on Joris Ide in Draft space and would appreciate any feedback from editors familiar with construction or building materials companies. Draft:Joris Ide AlexisJRI (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Richmond Park has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 03:09, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Outpost (military), which is within this project’s scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia’s Community portal in the “Articles for improvement” section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 December 2025 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

All Saints’ Church, Runcorn has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 20:33, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

I have nominated Oregon State Capitol for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare “Keep” or “Delist” in regards to the article’s featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 18:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Getty Center has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

St. Martin, Idstein has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:52, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Mount Hope Estate has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:54, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

The article Church of Reis Magos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as Unreferenced for 14 years, and for notability concerns for 7 months. No other language has a reliably sourced article from which to translate. A Google search in English found only similarly named churches in Goa, Bardez, and Panjim. Fails the relevant notability guidelines.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 01:11, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

The article 9th radio centre of Moscow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as needing more citations for 19 years. No other language has an article from which to translate. A Google search found only “mirrors” and social media links. Lacks significant coverage.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 02:43, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Please note that Building information modeling, which is within this project’s scope, has been selected as one of the Articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia’s Community portal in the “Articles for improvement” section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! Delivered by — MusikBot talk 00:05, 2 March 2026 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team

5th Avenue Theatre has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:13, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Foguang Temple has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 19:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)